Powering activity on the Moon and in cislunar space means choosing among surface solar, orbital arrays, and power beaming, then sizing the deployment. This architect models those options — capacity, mass, and the Starship flights to deliver them — so you can design a power system, not just guess at one.
It brings the generation, delivery, and logistics of space power into a single design view.
The tool sizes arrays for your target capacity, accounts for orbital versus surface losses, and converts mass into the number of heavy-lift flights required. Beaming options trade transmission losses for the flexibility of powering sites without local sun.
Because launch mass dominates cost, the architect highlights the mass-per-delivered-watt of each option — the figure that really decides how you power a lunar program.
Comparing surface solar against an orbital array with beaming shows how each trades sunlight availability against mass and flights, making clear why a mixed architecture often wins for a growing lunar base.
Surface solar, orbital arrays, and power beaming, with sizing for each.
Delivered mass, in per-flight chunks, drives cost and schedule.
Yes — beaming trades transmission efficiency for siting flexibility.
No — a transparent first-order architecture tool.
Yes — 25 languages, in-browser.